Regulatory Intelligence

MiCA CASP Register

The ESMA MiCA CASP register lists every crypto-asset service provider authorised to operate in the European Economic Area under Regulation (EU) 2023/1114. As of this snapshot, 280 firms hold authorisation across 27 EEA countries. Data and classification by Jamie Brew, Outrun Advisory.

snapshot
Crypto-native vs traditional finance across the EEA · ESMA register as of 3 July 2026 · classification is an interpretive overlay (MiCA defines no such split)
Loading register data…
Category breakdown
Licensed CASPs by country — hover a country for its breakdown
Small states (hover)
Licensed (shade = count) EU/EEA · no CASPs Outside EU/EEA
Malta, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg and Cyprus are listed on the right — too small to hover on the map.
Licences granted over time (cumulative)
Firms by number of MiCA permissions held
Company origin — European vs non-European, by category
Crypto Native — breakdown by sub-category
How many entities are licensed for each MiCA service (a firm can hold several).
What each MiCA service means
a · Custody & administration of crypto-assets

Safekeeping or controlling crypto-assets — or the means of access to them, e.g. private keys — on behalf of clients.

b · Operation of a trading platform

Running a marketplace that brings together multiple third-party buying and selling interests in crypto-assets so that a contract results (an exchange/venue).

c · Exchange of crypto-assets for funds

Buying or selling crypto-assets against fiat money with clients, dealing on the firm's own account (acting as counterparty).

d · Exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets

As above, but swapping one crypto-asset for another, on the firm's own account.

e · Execution of orders on behalf of clients

Concluding agreements to buy, sell or subscribe for crypto-assets on behalf of clients.

f · Placing of crypto-assets

Marketing newly-issued or offered crypto-assets to specific buyers on behalf of, or for, the offeror/issuer.

g · Reception & transmission of orders

Receiving a client's order to buy or sell crypto-assets and passing it to a third party for execution.

h · Advice on crypto-assets

Providing personalised recommendations to a client about crypto-assets or crypto-asset services.

i · Portfolio management on crypto-assets

Managing crypto-asset portfolios on a discretionary, client-by-client basis under each client's mandate.

j · Transfer services for crypto-assets

Moving crypto-assets from one distributed-ledger address or account to another on behalf of a client.

Plain-language summaries of the crypto-asset service definitions in MiCAR (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114), Article 3 — not verbatim legal text; consult the Regulation for the binding wording.
Corporate groups holding more than one CASP licence. Only Bitpanda spans multiple countries.
European origin vs non-European, by category
Non-European-origin firms (all listed)
Origin = where the ultimate parent is founded/headquartered, from the supplied origins dataset (parent company + origin country). The EU-licensed entity itself is always in the EEA; this shows who owns it. Geographic Europe (incl. UK, Switzerland, Norway) counts as European.
CountryCompany (legal name)Brand CategorySub-categoryOrigin regionOrigin countryParentServices
New licences
Auth. date Country Company (legal name) Brand Category Sub-category Services Origin region Origin country
Company websites
Every firm's brand in the Directory tab links straight to its official website (taken from the ESMA register). 16 entities have no website listed in the register.
Major global exchanges absent from this register snapshot
Binance

Not present in this snapshot.

Bitfinex

Not present in this snapshot.

Bitget

Not present in this snapshot.

MEXC

Not present in this snapshot.

HTX (Huobi)

Not present in this snapshot.

Upbit

Not present in this snapshot.

These well-known global exchanges do not appear in the 3 July 2026 register snapshot used here. Absence is a fact about this dataset only — it does not by itself confirm a firm has withdrawn from the EU or been refused; an application may be in progress, or status may have changed. Verify current standing with the relevant regulator or ESMA before relying on it.
Recent MiCA announcements (authorisations & refusals)

Week of 2026-06-30

Cointelegraph · 2026-07-04
Revolut to delist USDT in August, citing regulatory and risk concerns

Revolut announced it will remove USDT from its EU/EEA platform in August, with the decision driven by MiCA's requirement for stablecoin issuers to hold an e-money or asset-referenced token licence.

Cointelegraph · 2026-07-03
EU crypto rulebook faces enforcement challenge as MiCA transition ends

National regulators across the EU face significant practical hurdles enforcing MiCA now that the transition period has ended, with cross-border jurisdiction and supervisory resources cited as key obstacles.

Cointelegraph · 2026-07-03
StanChart joins ESMA's first MiCA register update since deadline

Standard Chartered was included in ESMA's first update to the CASP public register since the July 1 enforcement deadline, adding to the count of authorised crypto-asset service providers across the EEA.

CoinDesk · 2026-07-03
Binance says MiCA should be judged by who it licenses, not who it excludes

Binance's EU chief argued that MiCA's success should be measured by the quality and breadth of firms it authorises rather than those it excluded, in a defence of the framework after Binance failed to secure a licence.

CoinDesk · 2026-07-02
Three years after MiCA became law, Europe's crypto framework is undergoing a rethink

Three years after MiCA was enacted, EU lawmakers and regulators are already reviewing parts of the framework in light of enforcement gaps, passporting ambiguities, and evolving DeFi and stablecoin markets.

Cointelegraph · 2026-07-01
Last-minute MiCA approvals mark end of EU transition period

A final wave of CASP authorisations was granted across several EU member states in the days immediately before the July 1 transition deadline, bringing the total number of licensed providers to a new high.

CoinDesk · 2026-07-01
Europe's MiCA rollout sparks debate over who wins under new crypto rules

The full activation of MiCA's CASP provisions has sparked debate over whether the framework favours incumbent financial institutions over crypto-native firms, with licensing patterns so far skewing towards established players.

CoinDesk · 2026-07-01
Why Poland is the only EU country where crypto firms can't get a MiCA license

Poland has yet to pass the national legislation required to designate a CASP supervisor, leaving it the sole EU member state unable to issue MiCA authorisations.

The Block · 2026-07-01
Europe's MiCA crypto regime is fully in force: Here's who wins and loses

With the July 1 deadline arrived, The Block analyses which exchanges gained EU-wide licences, which pulled out, and what the fully-operative MiCA framework means for the market.

CoinDesk · 2026-06-30
Dubai set for crypto firm influx as MiCA deadline pushes companies to reassess Europe

Several crypto businesses are reportedly evaluating Dubai as an alternative hub after failing to secure MiCA authorisation ahead of the July 1 enforcement date.

Cointelegraph · 2026-06-30
ESMA MiCA warning puts Binance EU service changes under scrutiny

ESMA clarified that EU clients must be served through a MiCA-authorised entity after July 1; Binance's transition plan, potentially routing some EU users through its Abu Dhabi entity, drew legal questions about reverse solicitation.

Cointelegraph · 2026-06-29
Coinbase, Kraken and OKX move to swoop up EU users affected by MiCA restrictions

As Binance restricted services in several EU markets ahead of the July 1 deadline, Coinbase, Kraken and OKX each signalled readiness to onboard affected European users.

Cointelegraph · 2026-06-29
Germany leads MiCA crypto authorisation race as Europe's deadline looms

BaFin-issued licences pushed Germany to the top of the CASP authorisation table, with the total register count reaching 244 entities across the EEA.

Cointelegraph · 2026-06-28
Binance posts over $400M in weekly net outflows as MiCA deadline nears

Binance saw significant outflows in the days before the July 1 MiCA transition, coinciding with service restriction announcements for France, Spain, Italy and Poland.

Week of 2026-06-23

CoinDesk · 2026-06-29
MiCA's looming deadline could leave 10 million crypto users without a platform in the EU

Analysis estimates up to 10 million EU crypto users may need to migrate to a MiCA-licensed platform as unlicensed exchanges wind down EU services around the July 1 deadline.

CoinDesk · 2026-06-29
Europe's unlicensed crypto firms face 'wipeout' as MiCA deadline hits

Exchanges and brokers that failed to obtain CASP authorisation before the July 1 enforcement date face the prospect of exiting EU markets entirely or operating illegally.

Cointelegraph · 2026-06-26
Spain regulator rules out extension for non-MiCA compliant crypto companies

Spain's CNMV confirmed there will be no grace period beyond July 1 for firms not yet MiCA-authorised, raising pressure on exchanges still operating under transitional arrangements.

CoinDesk · 2026-06-27
Coinbase and OKX try to lure in Binance's EU users after it failed to secure a MiCA license

Coinbase and OKX launched targeted campaigns to attract Binance's estimated 450 million EU-based users following Binance's failure to secure a MiCA CASP licence.

CoinDesk · 2026-06-26
Binance tells EU users it will no longer provide services after failing to secure MiCA license

Binance formally notified its European user base that it will cease providing crypto-asset services in the EU following its inability to obtain a MiCA CASP authorisation.

Cointelegraph · 2026-06-25
Polish crypto exchange Kanga secures MiCA license in Latvia

Kanga received CASP authorisation from Latvia's regulator, giving the Polish exchange an EU-wide passport ahead of the July 1 deadline.

Cointelegraph · 2026-06-24
Binance Looks Beyond Greece for EU MiCA Authorisation

Binance withdrew its Greece-filed MiCA application and indicated it is pursuing alternative licensing paths within the EU ahead of the transition deadline.

CoinDesk · 2026-06-24
Binance withdraws Greek MiCA bid but vows to remain in Europe

Binance confirmed it has withdrawn its MiCA licence application filed via Greece while stating it remains committed to operating in the European market through alternative routes.

Cointelegraph · 2026-06-24
OpenPayd secures MiCA licence as stablecoin adoption grows in Europe

Payments infrastructure firm OpenPayd obtained a MiCA CASP licence, positioning itself to offer stablecoin settlement services to European clients.

Cointelegraph · 2026-06-23
Ripple gains preliminary MiCA licence ahead of July 1 EU deadline

Ripple received a preliminary CASP authorisation, enabling it to offer regulated crypto-asset services across the EEA before the July 1 transition.

Week of 2026-06-16

Headlines and links retrieved from public sources (Cointelegraph, The Block). Auto-refreshed weekly.

Frequently asked questions

What is MiCA?

MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114) is the EU legal framework for crypto-asset services. It requires any firm offering crypto-asset services to clients in the European Economic Area to obtain authorisation from a national regulator. Full enforcement for crypto-asset service providers began on 1 July 2026. Once authorised in one EEA country, a firm can passport its services to all 30 EEA member states without separate national approvals. MiCA defines ten service types: custody, operation of a trading platform, exchange for funds, exchange for other crypto-assets, execution of orders, placing of crypto-assets, reception and transmission of orders, advice, portfolio management, and transfer services. MiCA also governs issuers of asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, though the CASP register covers service providers only.

What is a CASP under MiCA?

A CASP (crypto-asset service provider) is any firm authorised by an EEA national regulator to offer one or more of the ten MiCA service types to clients in the European Economic Area. To obtain authorisation, a firm must satisfy MiCA's requirements on capital adequacy, governance, safeguarding of client assets, conflicts of interest, and market integrity. Authorisation is granted by the national competent authority (NCA) of the country where the firm is established. Once authorised, the firm notifies ESMA, which publishes the firm's details in the public CASP register. CASPs include large crypto exchanges, specialist custodians, payments providers, and traditional financial institutions adding crypto services to their existing regulated activities. This register covers only MiCA-authorised CASPs. Firms operating under transitional arrangements or with pending applications do not appear here.

Which exchanges have a MiCA licence?

As of this snapshot, MiCA-authorised crypto exchanges include Coinbase Europe (Ireland), Kraken (Ireland), OKX Europe (Malta), and Bitstamp (Luxembourg). Germany has issued the largest number of CASP licences overall, with BaFin authorising a broad mix of crypto-native and traditional financial firms. The full list of authorised entities is searchable in the Directory tab. Notable absences as of this snapshot include Binance, Bitfinex, Bitget, MEXC, HTX, and Upbit. Absence from this register does not confirm a refusal: an application may be in progress, or a firm may have obtained authorisation after the snapshot date. For the current authorisation status of any firm, verify directly with ESMA or the relevant national competent authority.

Does Binance have a MiCA licence?

No. As of this snapshot, Binance does not appear in the ESMA MiCA CASP register. Binance filed an application in Greece and withdrew it in June 2026 without securing authorisation. Following the 1 July 2026 enforcement date, Binance notified users in France, Spain, Italy, Poland, and other EU markets that it can no longer provide crypto-asset services. ESMA has also raised questions about whether routing certain EU users through Binance's Abu Dhabi entity would comply with MiCA's reverse solicitation provisions. This register is updated weekly. If Binance's status changes, it will appear in the following week's refresh. For the most current status, verify directly at the ESMA website or with the relevant national competent authority.

Which country has issued the most MiCA licences?

Germany leads the EEA by CASP count, with BaFin issuing more authorisations than any other national regulator. This reflects Germany's existing financial infrastructure: many firms already regulated under German law applied to extend their authorisation to cover MiCA services rather than incorporate elsewhere. Ireland and Malta also rank highly, driven by Coinbase, Kraken, and OKX, which established their EU-facing entities there before MiCA came into force. The full country breakdown is in the By Country tab. Country counts reflect where the CASP is registered, not where its clients are located. A German-licensed firm can serve clients across all 30 EEA countries under MiCA's passporting framework.

How does MiCA passporting work?

A firm authorised as a CASP in one EEA country can offer the same services across all other EEA member states without seeking separate national approvals. The authorised firm notifies its home regulator, which informs ESMA and the relevant host country regulators. Passporting covers only the specific services listed in the firm's authorisation. Adding service types requires amending the original authorisation with the home regulator. The EEA covers 30 countries: the 27 EU member states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway. A CASP registered in any one of those countries can passport to the remaining 29. This is the primary reason many non-European exchanges chose to establish an EU-based entity ahead of the July 2026 enforcement date.

What is the difference between crypto-native and TradFi on this dashboard?

This dashboard divides CASPs into two groups. Crypto-native firms are businesses whose primary activity is crypto-asset services: exchanges, brokers, custodians, payment providers, and infrastructure operators. TradFi firms are traditional financial institutions (banks, investment firms, payments institutions, and electronic money institutions) that have added MiCA authorisation alongside their existing regulated activities. This split is a classification by Outrun Advisory and is not a category defined by MiCA or ESMA. The classification is based on each firm's primary business model and is marked "under review" where the assessment is not yet confirmed. All firms in both groups hold valid MiCA CASP authorisations from a national competent authority.

How often is this register updated?

The dashboard is updated every Monday by an automated process that pulls the latest data from the ESMA MiCA CASP register and curates recent news from Cointelegraph, CoinDesk, and The Block. ESMA updates its own register continuously as national regulators notify it of new authorisations, amendments, or withdrawals, so there may be a gap of up to seven days between a licensing event and its appearance here. For time-sensitive compliance work or legal decisions, verify firm status directly at the ESMA website or with the relevant national competent authority. This dashboard is a research and monitoring tool, not a legal source of record.